Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Danforth v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The Congress, in other situations, has adopted the time of taking as the date for determination of value. [11] For the reason that compensation is due at the time of taking, the owner at that time, not the owner at an earlier or later date, receives the payment. [12] Unless a taking has occurred previously in actuality or by a statutory provision, which fixes the time of taking by an event such as the filing of an action, [13] we are of the view that the taking in a condemnation suit under this statute takes place upon the payment of the money award by the condemnor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Danforth v. United States — Opinion of the Court

We have no doubt that the authority to purchase given to the Secretary of War is sufficiently broad to authorize a purchase of petitioner's interest in land subject to perfecting the title through condemnation. The effect of such an agreement is to fix the value of the easement when the authority of the Court is invoked against a party to the agreement to acquire good title.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature