Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Smith v. United States (337 U.S. 137…

Nor do we see any reason why claim of privilege to all or any part of testimony may not be withdrawn. Although the privilege against self-incrimination must be claimed, when claimed it is guaranteed by the Constitution. Thereafter only absolute immunity from federal criminal prosecution is sufficient to compel the desired testimony. Waiver of constitutional rights, however, is not lightly to be inferred. [11] A witness cannot properly be held after claim to have waived his privilege and consequent immunity upon vague and uncertain evidence.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Smith v. United States (337 U.S. 137…

In these transactions petitioner and his corporation in conspiracy with the other person indicted used fictitious names, gave false descriptions of goods and prices, and falsified invoices, but the money paid for the goods arrived by circuitous and devious routes into the bank accounts of either petitioner or Daisart Sportswear, Inc.
Such evidence is amply sufficient to sustain petitioner's conviction on the informations and indictment, but he insists that he is immune from prosecution for the acts of which he stands convicted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature