Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Oaksmith's Lessee v. Johnson — Opinion of the Court

But in the action of ejectment, in the Federal courts, the legal title must control, and to another forum the plaintiff must look for the enforcement of any equitable rights he may possess.
The legal title being in the United States, the Statute of Limitations raises no bar to the action. Mere possession of the land, though open, exclusive, and uninterrupted for twenty years, creates no impediment to a recovery by the government, and of course none to a recovery by one who within that period receives its conveyance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Oaksmith's Lessee v. Johnson — Opinion of the Court

But in this country, at the present day, there can seldom be occasion to invoke the presumption of a grant from the government, except in cases of very ancient possessions running back to colonial days, as, since the commencement of the present century, a record has been preserved of all grants of the government, and of the various preliminary steps up to their issue
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Oaksmith's Lessee v. Johnson — Opinion of the Court

The presumption in such cases arises not merely from the possibilities of the loss of documents by the common accidents of time, but from the general experience of men that property is not usually suffered to remain for long periods in the quiet possession of any one but the true owner, and that no other person will deliberately add to the value of the property by permanent improvements.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature