Summary

Portrait of W. E. Gladstone W. E. Gladstone Female suffrage. A letter from the Right Hon… (1892)

For a long time we drew a distinction between competency to vote and competency to sit in Parliament. But long before our electorate had attained to the present popular proportions, this distinction was felt to involve a palpable inconsistency, and accordingly it died away. It surely cannot be revived: and if it cannot be revived, then the woman's vote carries with it, whether by the same Bill or by a consequential Bill, the woman's seat in Parliament. These assertions ought to be strictly tested. But, if they cannot be confuted, do not let them be ignored.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of W. E. Gladstone W. E. Gladstone Female suffrage. A letter from the Right Hon… (1892)

There is nothing more odious, nothing more untenable, than an inequality in legal privilege which does not stand upon some principle in its nature broad and clear. Is there here such a principle, adequate to show that when capacity to sit in Parliament has been established, the title to discharge executive and judicial duty can be withheld?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature