Summary

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan Furman v. Georgia — Concurring Opinion

As one 19th century proponent of punishing criminals by death declared,
When a man is hung, there is an end of our relations with him. His execution is a way of saying, "You are not fit for this world, take your chance elsewhere." [39] [p291] In comparison to all other punishments today, then, the deliberate extinguishment of human life by the State is uniquely degrading to human dignity. I would not hesitate to hold, on that ground alone, that death is today a "cruel and unusual" punishment, were it not that death is a punishment of longstanding usage and acceptance in this country.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan Furman v. Georgia — Concurring Opinion

In sum, we have made death a rare punishment today.
The progressive decline in, and the current rarity of, the infliction of death demonstrate that our society seriously questions the appropriateness of this punishment today. The States point out that many legislatures authorize death as the punishment for certain crimes, and that substantial segments of the public, as reflected in opinion polls and referendum votes, continue to support it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan Furman v. Georgia — Concurring Opinion

Although pragmatic arguments for and against the punishment have been frequently advanced, this longstanding and heated controversy cannot be explained solely as the result of differences over the practical wisdom of a particular government policy. At bottom, the battle has been waged on moral grounds. The country has debated whether a society for which the dignity of the individual is the supreme value can, without a fundamental inconsistency, follow the practice of deliberately putting some of its members to death.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature