Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. United States v. Robel — Concurrence

Even if the statute is not overbroad on its face because there may be 'defense facilities' so essential to our national security that Congress could constitutionally exclude all Party members from employment in them-the congressional delegation of authority to the Secretary of Defense to designate 'defense facilities' creates the danger of overbroad, unauthorized, and arbitrary application of criminal sanctions in an area of protected freedoms and therefore, in my view, renders this statute invalid.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. United States v. Robel — Concurrence

The Secretary's role in designating 'defense facilities' is fundamental to the potential breadth of the statute since the greater the number and types of facilities designated, the greater is the indiscriminate denial of job opportunities, under threat of criminal punishment, to Party members because of their political associations. A clear, manageable standard might have been a significant limitation upon the Secretary's discretion. But the standard under which Congress delegated the designating power is so indefinite as to be meaningless.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature