Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Ellis v. Dixon — Opinion of the Court

What has been alleged is entirely too amorphous to permit adjudication of the constitutional issues asserted. And we think the most reasonable inference from this record is that the Court of Appeals' denial of petitioner's motion for leave to appeal went on that ground, rather than on the ground, suggested on behalf of respondents, that in proceeding by way of leave to appeal rather than by an appeal as of right the petitioner had followed the wrong appellate route.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Ellis v. Dixon — Opinion of the Court

Any yet petitioner has failed to allege in his pleading, which upon respondents' motion was dismissed prior to answer, that other organizations of a similar character to the Committee for Peace have been allowed use of the Yonkers schools. The allegations of that pleading simply are that unnamed and undescribed 'organizations' have been allowed to use Yonkers school buildings in the past 'for the purpose of public assembly and discussion.' [3] Whether such organizations are in any way comparable to the Committee for Peace nowhere appears in the pleading.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature