Summary

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Johnson (173 U.S. 363…

We are of opinion that congress intended by sections 1764 and 1765 to uproot the practice under which, in the absence of any statute expressly authorizing it, extra allowances or special compensation were made to public officers for services which they were required to render in consideration only of the fixed salary and emoluments established for them by law.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Johnson (173 U.S. 363…

When, therefore, a district attorney makes a charge against the treasury for services, he must support it by showing some clause in the fee bill which authorizes him to receive what he claims. When a duty is enjoined upon him by the law of his office, and not merely by the request of a department, he is bound to perform it, and take as compensation what the law gives him.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan United States v. Johnson (173 U.S. 363…

All the civil business of the government concerns some one of its departments, and may require the attention of its head. It cannot be that a suit in the name of the United States, pending in the district or circuit court, is out of the scope of the regular duty of a district attorney because of its arising in the business of the navy department, rather than the treasury or any other department
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature