Right to bear arms

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia,  District of Columbia v. Heller… (2008)

“ The right to bear arms has always been the distinctive privilege of freemen. Aside from any necessity of self-protection to the person, it represents among all nations power coupled with the exercise of a certain jurisdiction.... [I] t was not necessary that the right to bear arms should be granted in the Constitution, for it had always existed. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens,  District of Columbia v. Heller… (2008)

“ That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and their own State, or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed for disarming the people or any of them unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury from individuals; and as standing armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to, and be governed by the civil powers. ”
Source: Wikisource

Hugh Franklin Waters,  Norwood v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine… (1987 | noyear)

“ While few of us would want to change our system which protects such a large array of "rights," it may be that we have more than most of us need, and more than is good for a majority of us. We have the right to "bear arms" and with that right has come personal ownership of a veritable flood of weapons of almost every description, many of which are designed to, and have no other purpose than to, "hurt people." ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature