Johan J. Bolhuis; Ian Tattersall; Noam Chomsky; Robert C. Berwick

Biographical details

Johan J. Bolhuis; Ian Tattersall; Noam Chomsky; Robert C. Berwick How Could Language Have Evolved…

Then, within a remarkably short space of time, art was invented, cities were born, and people had reached the moon. By this reckoning, the language faculty is an extremely recent acquisition in our lineage, and it was acquired not in the context of slow, gradual modification of preexisting systems under natural selection but in a single, rapid, emergent event that built upon those prior systems but was not predicted by them.
Source: Wikisource

Johan J. Bolhuis; Ian Tattersall; Noam Chomsky; Robert C. Berwick How Could Language Have Evolved…

In the last few years, certain linguistic theories have arrived at a much more narrowly defined and precise phenotype characterizing human language syntax. In place of a complex rule system or accounts grounded on general notions of “culture” or “communication,” it appears that human language syntax can be defined in an extremely simple way that makes conventional evolutionary explanations much simpler. In this view, human language syntax can be characterized via a single operation that takes exactly two (syntactic) elements a and b and puts them together to form the set {a, b}.
Source: Wikisource

Johan J. Bolhuis; Ian Tattersall; Noam Chomsky; Robert C. Berwick How Could Language Have Evolved…

The language faculty is often equated with “communication”—a trait that is shared by all animal species and possibly also by plants. In our view, for the purposes of scientific understanding, language should be understood as a particular computational cognitive system, implemented neurally, that cannot be equated with an excessively expansive notion of “language as communication” [1] . Externalized language may be used for communication, but that particular function is largely irrelevant in this context.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature