MaryAnn P. Noonan; Jerome Sallet; Rogier B. Mars; Franz X. Neubert; Jill X. O'Reilly; Jesper L. Andersson; Anna S. Mitchell; Andrew H. Bell; Karla L. Miller; Matthew F. S. Rushworth

Biographical details

MaryAnn P. Noonan; Jerome Sallet; Rogier B. Mars; Franz X. Neubert; Jill X. O'Reilly; Jesper L. Andersson; Anna S. Mitchell; Andrew H. Bell; Karla L. Miller; Matthew F. S. Rushworth A Neural Circuit Covarying with Social Hierarchy in Macaques…

Social status is a salient feature of group life in many primates including humans and macaques [1] . Position in the dominance hierarchy influences access to food and mates and is a predictor of health and reproductive success [2] . It is also associated with individual differences in behavior; for instance, more dominant macaques make more prosocial choices and are more likely to make a choice that leads to reward for both themselves and another as opposed to a choice that leads just to reward for themselves [3] , [4] .
Source: Wikisource

MaryAnn P. Noonan; Jerome Sallet; Rogier B. Mars; Franz X. Neubert; Jill X. O'Reilly; Jesper L. Andersson; Anna S. Mitchell; Andrew H. Bell; Karla L. Miller; Matthew F. S. Rushworth A Neural Circuit Covarying with Social Hierarchy in Macaques…

Social status in male macaques is not simply the consequence of successful engagement in agonistic behavior but a consequence of success in forming social bonds that promote coalitions between individuals [2] . We suggest that the second set of regions—mSTS and rostral PFC—in which GM was related to both social status and social network size may mediate the way in which dominance is dependent on social bond formation, which is in turn dependent on social cognition.
Source: Wikisource

MaryAnn P. Noonan; Jerome Sallet; Rogier B. Mars; Franz X. Neubert; Jill X. O'Reilly; Jesper L. Andersson; Anna S. Mitchell; Andrew H. Bell; Karla L. Miller; Matthew F. S. Rushworth A Neural Circuit Covarying with Social Hierarchy in Macaques…

An alternative approach to studying the neural correlates of primate dominance has been to induce relative differences in social status during the playing of interactive games in human subjects. The amygdala was recently implicated in tracking social hierarchy during performance of such a game in human subjects [9] , but the degree to which playing brief and artificial games induces or simulates the often protracted differences in dominance status experienced by primates, including humans, in the real world remains unclear.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature