Summary

Portrait of Arthur Conan Doyle Arthur Conan Doyle The Stark Munro Letters — OAKLEY VILLAS, BIRCHESPOOL, 12th June… (1895)

Leaving this exaggerated scientific caution on the one side, and faith on the other, as being equally indefensible, there remains the clear line of reasoning that a universe implies the existence of a universe maker, and that we may deduce from it some of His attributes, His power, His wisdom, His forethought for small wants, His providing of luxuries for His creatures.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Conan Doyle Arthur Conan Doyle The Stark Munro Letters — OAKLEY VILLAS, BIRCHESPOOL, 12th June… (1895)

The man who claims that we can know nothing is, to my mind, as unreasonable as he who insists that everything has been divinely revealed to us. I know nothing more unbearable than the complacent type of scientist who knows very exactly all that he does know, but has not imagination enough to understand what a speck his little accumulation of doubtful erudition is when compared with the immensity of our ignorance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Conan Doyle Arthur Conan Doyle The Stark Munro Letters — OAKLEY VILLAS, BIRCHESPOOL, 12th June… (1895)

You may fit up your dogmatic scientist with a 300- diameter microscope, and with a telescope with a six-foot speculum, but neither near nor far can he get a trace of that great driving power.
What should we say of a man who has a great and beautiful picture submitted to him, and who, having satisfied himself that the account given of the painting of the picture is incorrect, at once concludes that no one ever painted it, or at least asserts that he has no possible means of knowing whether an artist has produced it or not?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature