Summary

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

If competition between workingmen to see who will work for the lowest wage is the ideal, all labor unions should be eliminated. Indeed the Court itself apparently realizes that its holding that the antitrust laws are violated when a labor union agrees with employers not to compete on wages is premised on the belief that labor is a commodity and that this premise leads to the logical conclusion that unions themselves restrain trade in this commodity.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

No one, I think, believes that Congress intended that there be an economic system under which unions would compete with each other to supply labor at the lowest possible cost. It is equally clear that Congress did not intend that competition among manufacturers should be carried on, not on the basis of their relative efficiency or ability to produce what the consumer demands, but on their ability to operate at substandard wage rates.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

Under such an analysis, it would seem to follow that the existence of a union itself constitutes a restraint of trade, for the object of a union is to band together the individual workers in an effort, by common action, to obtain better wages and working conditions-i.e., to obtain a higher price for their labor. The very purpose and effect of a labor union is to limit the power of an employer to use competition among workingmen to drive down wage rates and enforce substandard conditions of employment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature