Summary

Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

For then the obvious restraint on the product market-the exclusion of self-service stores from the evening market for meat would stand alone, unmitigated and unjustified by the vital interests of the union butchers which are relied upon in this case. In such event the limitation imposed by the unions might well be reduced to nothing but an effort by the unions to protect one group of employers from competition by another, which is conduct that is not exempt from the Sherman Act.
Source: Wikisource

Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

Thus the issue in this case is whether the marketing-hours restriction, like wages, and unlike prices, is so intimately related to wages, hours and working conditions that the unions' successful attempt to obtain that provision through bona fide, arm's-length bargaining in pursuit of their own labor union policies, and not at the behest of or in combination with nonlabor groups, falls within the protection of the national labor policy and is therefore exempt from the Sherman Act.
Source: Wikisource

Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v…

Weighing the respective interests involved, we think the national labor policy expressed in the National Labor Relations Act places beyond the reach of the Sherman Act union-employer agreements on when, as well as how long, employees must work. An agreement on these subjects between the union and the employers in a bargaining unit is not illegal under the Sherman Act, nor is the union's unilateral demand for the same contract of other employers in the industry.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature