Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Sinclair Refining Company v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Company…

The remedy of discovery is as appropriate for proof of a plaintiff's damages as it is for proof of other facts essential to his case.
Help for the solution of problems of this order is not to be looked for in restrictive formulas. Procedure must have the capacity of flexible adjustment to changing groups of facts. The law of discovery has been invested at times with unnecessary mystery. There are few fields where considerations of practical convenience should play a larger role. The rationale of the remedy, when used as an auxiliary process in aid of trials at law, is simplicity itself.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Sinclair Refining Company v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Company…

The point is made in it that damages are not part of the 'issues' in a lawsuit, and that the interrogatories to be answered by a defendant under a bill of discovery are to be directed to the issues and not to anything else. There is indeed a rule of common-law pleading that the statement of general damages in the ad damnum clause of a complaint is not an issuable allegation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Sinclair Refining Company v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Company…

The use that has been made of he patented device is a legitimate aid to the appraisal of the value of the patent at the time of the breach.
This is not a case where the recovery can be measured by the current prices of a market. A patent is a thing unique. There can be no contemporaneous sales to express the market value of an invention that derives from its novelty its patentable quality.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature