Summary

Bruno Bauer Translation:Critique of the Gospels and a History of their Origin (1850)

For the ecclesiastical consciousness at least and for those who owe their sacred history to the mysterious tradition, this proof will never be there. In the sandy desert of their obscurity and dissolution, the bearers of ecclesiastical consciousness will invincibly and irrefutably resist any progress of culture, and if they were in need of an ally against research, they are sure of one in those mighty spirits who are so secure in their unbelief that that they have not fought the battle unnecessarily, the detail of the proof an abundance, the execution a useless burden.
Source: Wikisource

Bruno Bauer Translation:Critique of the Gospels and a History of their Origin (1850)

Out of indifference to itself, antiquity ignores research – but it also avoids it because it does not want to be recognized, i.e. because it does not want to give itself up, and because it hopes to win once again in its subtle half-heartedness, weakness and disgruntlement. If the European upheaval of 1848 was a consequence of the passive dissolution to which the entire antiquity fell victim, why should the fall not more often lead to glimpses in which whole parts of the old edifice once again collapse with a crash?
Source: Wikisource

Bruno Bauer Translation:Critique of the Gospels and a History of their Origin (1850)

It will never lack confessors who suspect nothing of the fact that their foundation of life was only one of those layers on which the ever higher rising ground of history rests; it will never lack teachers who, by their obscurity and by the indeterminacy of their spirit, are made to serve as bearers of the confused and attenuated tradition of a power which, by the clarity and sharpness of its inner contrasts, had subjugated the world to itself.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature