Summary

Byron White Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc…

But if there would be no prima facie case of disparate impact in the selection of noncannery workers absent petitioners' use of local 37 to hire cannery workers, surely petitioners' reliance on the union to fill the cannery jobs not at issue here (and its resulting "overrepresentation" of nonwhites in those positions) does not standing alone-make out a prima facie case of disparate impact. Yet it is precisely such an ironic result that the Court of Appeals reached below.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc…

Since the statistical disparity relied on by the Court of Appeals did not suffice to make out a prima facie case, any inquiry by us into whether the specific challenged employment practices of petitioners caused that disparity is pretermitted, as is any inquiry into whether the disparate impact that any employment practice may have had was justified by business considerations.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White Wards Cove Packing Company, Inc…

Thus, even if petitioners could show that the percentage of selected applicants who are nonwhite is not significantly less than the percentage of qualified applicants who are nonwhite, respondents would still have a case under Title VII, if they could prove that some particular hiring practice has a disparate impact on minorities, notwithstanding the bottom-line racial balance in petitioners' workforce.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature