Summary

Charles Evans Hughes Continental Baking Company v. Woodring…

We perceive no uncertainty by reason of the first exemption which definitely applies to cases of operation exclusively within the limits of a city or village. As to the second exemption, the state authorities assert, and it is not denied, that, in the administration of the act, the public service commission has taken the exemption to mean that 'so long as private carriers operate within a radius of twenty-five miles of their home city or base they are not subject to the payment of the fee.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Evans Hughes Continental Baking Company v. Woodring…

The highways are being pounded to pieces by these great trucks which, combining weight with speed, are making the problem of maintenance well-nigh insoluble. The Legislature but voiced the sentiment of the entire state in deciding that those who daily use the highways for commercial purposes should pay an additional tax. Moreover, these powerful and speedy trucks are the menace of the highways.'
It is apparent that Kansas, in framing its legislation to meet these conditions, did not attempt to compel private carriers to become public carriers.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Evans Hughes Continental Baking Company v. Woodring…

Public motor carriers, contract motor carriers, and private motor carriers of property are forbidden to operate motor vehicles for compensation on any public highway except in accordance with the provisions of the act. Section 4. [4] The public service commission is vested with supervision of these carriers in all matters affecting their relationship 'with the traveling and shipping public' and, specifically, to prescribe regulations in certain particulars hereinafter mentioned. Section 5. [5] All transportation charges made by public motor carriers must be just and reasonable.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature