Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. American Trucking Associations…

It seems equally evident that where these vehicles or operators were common or contract carriers, it was not intended by Congress to give the Commission power to regulate the qualifications and hours of service of employees, other than those concerned with the safety of operations.
Our conclusion, in view of the circumstances set out in this opinion, is that the meaning of employees in Section 204 (a) (1) and (2) is limited to those employees whose activities affect the safety of operation. The Commission has no jurisdiction to regulate the qualifications or hours of service of any others.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed United States v. American Trucking Associations…

This is peculiarly true here where the interpretations involve 'contemporaneous construction of a statute by the men charged with the responsibility of setting its machinery in motion; of making the parts work efficiently and smoothly while they are yet untried and new.' [38] Furthermore, the Commission's interpretation gains much persuasiveness from the fact that it was the Commission which suggested the provisions' enactment to Congress. [39]
It is important to remember that the Commission has three times concluded that its authority was limited to securing safety of operation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature