Charles Whitney Gilmore

Charles Whitney Gilmore

Summary

Portrait of Charles Whitney Gilmore Charles Whitney Gilmore Notes on Osteology of Baptanodon… (1906)

There is a well developed trochanter on the dorsal surface.
The ulna is a pentagonal block of bone, the proximal being thicker than the distal end. The proximal end is slightly convex and was opposed to the concave
facet on the distal end of the humerus though probably separated by cartilage. The other sides are slightly convex and were evidently surrounded by a thick cartilage as indicated by their rugose surfaces. The upper and lower surfaces are slightly concave antero-posteriorly. The element appears to be More angular than the ulna of Baptanodon marshi.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Whitney Gilmore Charles Whitney Gilmore Notes on Osteology of Baptanodon… (1906)

See Fig. 1 has many more nerve pits for the entrance of nerves to the teeth than was indicated in the first restoration of the skull of Baptanodon. A pineal foramen appears to be present and occupying essentially the same position as in the other skulls in this museum. The posterior part of the skull is so badly dis-arranged that nothing of importance is shown.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Whitney Gilmore Charles Whitney Gilmore Notes on Osteology of Baptanodon… (1906)

The diapophyses on all of the vertebræ preserved are very robust and confluent with the articular surfaces on the dorsal surfaces of the centra. The fourth to the ninth cervicals have a vertical ridge connecting the di- and parapophyses on the anterior margin of the centra. This character may also prove to be a feature of this species.
The anterior or median dorsals placed well down on the anterior have two well defined apophyses (See Fig. 13) margins of the centra. The diapophysis is the Fig. 13. Lateral view of anterior or median dorsals of Baptanodon robustus (No. 919) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature