Summary

Dewitt Bristol Brace On Double Refraction in Matter moving through the Aether (1904)

THE FitzGerald-Lorentz [2] "Contraction" Hypothesis to explain the negative results of the Michelson-Morley [3] experiment of interference between two rays, at right angles and parallel to the earth's motion, has been tested by Rayleigh [4] in his experiments on the double refraction of liquids and of glass. He assumes the contraction to be , and also the excess of the index above unity to be proportional to the density.
Source: Wikisource

Dewitt Bristol Brace On Double Refraction in Matter moving through the Aether (1904)

Hence, we may conclude that to this order of sensibility there is no double refraction in the water due to its motion through the æther. These observations were taken during the latter part of July 1903. It is evident that a rotation of the plane of polarization due to the earth's field of force would not affect this match, as both portions of the field would vary in intensity by the same amount. To make sure of this the trough was rotated through 180° into the meridian so as to reverse the direction: but no effect could be observed.
Source: Wikisource

Dewitt Bristol Brace On Double Refraction in Matter moving through the Aether (1904)

A direct shift of the cross-wires gave 13 divisions as the sensibility. Using direct white light and the sensitive strip and compensator 0°.1 rotation of the latter could be detected, thus giving it a sensibility of ×0.1=8 gms., or 12.5 times that of the band under similar conditions of light intensity and adjustment. [6] With greater intensity and more careful adjustment higher sensibility could be obtained by both methods. In fact, Rayleigh, using lime-light and a black band, has been able to detect a weight of 25 gms. on a vertical glass strip 15 mms.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature