Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Griffin v. United States (336 U.S. 704…

Nothing that has been said concerning the various possible choices is intended as an expression of preference among the competing rules about the admissibility of uncommunicated threats, nor as the slightest restriction upon the freedom of the Court of Appeals to make its own choice. We purposely withhold any expression of opinion on the merits of any of the permissible views on admissibility of this evidence. Certainly nothing in our decisions forecloses the Court of Appeals from selecting an one in the range of choices open to it, each one having some rational basis.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Griffin v. United States (336 U.S. 704…

This Court, in its decisions, and Congress, in its enactment of statutes, have often recognized the appropriateness of one rule for the District and another for other jurisdictions so far as they are subject to federal law. Thus, the 'federal rule' in first-degree murder cases is that, unless the jury by unanimous vote agrees that the penalty should be death, the court must fix the sentence at imprisonment for life.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Griffin v. United States (336 U.S. 704…

The problem of the admissibility of the evidence set forth in the motion for a new trial is serious and its wise solution full of difficulty. The problem was apparently not explored below, and at the bar of this Court counsel did not give it the consideration appropriate for determination of a federal issue of general importance. It was not even argued in their briefs. Under such circumstances it is not for us to announce a rule for the District of Columbia.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature