Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Minersville School District v. Gobitis… (1940)

To stigmatize legislative judgment in providing for this universal gesture of respect for the symbol of our national life in the setting of the common school as a lawless inroad on that freedom of conscience which the Constitution protects, would amount to no less than the pronouncement of pedagogical and psychological dogma in a field where courts possess no marked and certainly no controlling competence. The influences which help toward a common feeling for the common country are manifold. Some may seem harsh and others no doubt are foolish.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Minersville School District v. Gobitis… (1940)

To state the problem is to recall the truth that no single principle can answer all of life's complexities. The right to freedom of religious belief, however dissident and however obnoxious to the cherished beliefs of others-even of a majority-is itself the denial of an absolute. But to affirm that the freedom to follow conscience has itself no limits in the life of a society would deny that very plurality of principles which, as a matter of history, underlies protection of religious toleration.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Minersville School District v. Gobitis… (1940)

Such a sentiment is fostered by all those agencies of the mind and spirit which may serve to gather up the traditions of a people, transmit them from generation to generation, and thereby create that continuity of a treasured common life which constitutes a civilization. 'We live by symbols.' The flag is the symbol of our national unity, transcending all internal differences, however large, within the framework of the Constitution.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature