Franklin Day Jones

Summary

Franklin Day Jones Turning and Boring

There is a difference of opinion among machinists as to the proper shape of the cutting point of a boring tool for finishing cuts, some contending that a wide cutting edge is to be preferred, while others advocate the use of a comparatively narrow edge with a reduced feed. It is claimed, that the narrow tool produces a more perfect bore, as it is not so easily affected by hard spots in the iron, and it is also pointed out that the minute ridges left by the narrow tool are an advantage rather than a disadvantage, as they form pockets for oil and aid in lubricating the cylinder.
Source: Gutenberg

Franklin Day Jones Turning and Boring

The term cutting speed should not be confused with revolutions per minute, because the cutting speed depends not only upon the speed of the work but also upon its diameter. The feed of a tool is the amount it moves across the surface being turned for each revolution; that is, when turning a cylindrical piece, the feed is the amount that the tool moves sidewise for each revolution of the work. Evidently the time required for turning is governed largely by the cutting speed, the feed, and the depth of the cut
Source: Gutenberg

Franklin Day Jones Turning and Boring

To illustrate, tool A is of a shape suitable for rough-turning large and rigid work, while tool B is adapted for smaller and more flexible parts. The first tool is well shaped for roughing because experiments have shown that a cutting edge of a large radius is capable of higher cutting speed than could be used with a tool like B, which has a smaller point. This increase [65] in the cutting speed is due to the fact that the tool A removes a thinner chip for a given feed than tool B; therefore, the speed may be increased without injuring the cutting edge to the same extent.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature