Summary

H. A. O'Brien Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (1891)

The English practice of teaching prisoners to plead not guilty, that they may thus have a chance of escaping from punishment, is inconsistent with this and consequently objectionable. It is indeed right and proper that the Court should inform itself of all the circumstances of a crime from witnesses as well as from the declaration of the prisoner himself. Denial is in fact an aggravation of a crime according to every idea of common sense. It disarins punishment of one of its most beneficial objects by casting a shade of doubt over its justice.
Source: Wikisource

H. A. O'Brien Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (1891)

In fixing a scale of punishments, the first principle to be attended to is that they should be so graduated as to attach to each particular crime its due and relative punishment according to its enormity, and with regard to the nature of the punishments they should be as mild and humane as the general security of person and property admits of. Severity of punishment defeats its own end, and the laws should in all cases be so mild that no one may be deterred from prosecuting a criminal by considerations of humanity.
Source: Wikisource

H. A. O'Brien Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (1891)

If a man takes another's horse or cow by robbery or theft or under a mistaken idea that he has a right to the property in question, redress can be afforded to him as soon as he is convicted of his crime or discovers his error, but if from revenge or under false impressions a man is suddenly excited to take the life of a fellow creature, it is in vain that he afterwards discovers that he was misled by passion or had been deceived by appearances.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature