Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Murphy Oil Company v. Burnet — Opinion of the Court

This is obvious where royalties alone are insufficient to return the capital investment. A distinction between royalties and bonus, which would allow a depletion deduction on the former but tax the latter in full as income, when received, making no provision for a reasonably anticipated production of oil on the leased premises, would deny the 'reasonable allowance for depletion' which the statute provides. The harsh operation of such a rule with respect to taxpayers generally is apparent, and is emphasized by the opportunist character of petitioner's argument here.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Murphy Oil Company v. Burnet — Opinion of the Court

Where a lessor receives a bonus or other sum in addition to royalties, such bonus or other sum shall be regarded as a return of capital to the lessor, but only to the extent of the capital remaining to be recovered through depletion by the lessor at the date of the lease. If the bonus exceeds the capital remaining to be recovered, the excess and all the royalties thereafter received will be income and not depletable.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature