Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. New York Central Railroad Company…

When we consider the nature and extent of the commingling of interstate and intrastate commerce, and the difficulty of segregating the freight passing through the terminal, we think it clear that Congress in employing such broad language as 'the Commission shall have full authority to determine and prescribe the terms and conditions upon which these connecting tracks shall be operated' intended to confer upon the Commission power to regulate the entire stream of commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. New York Central Railroad Company…

A determination with respect to construction costs was not necessary since the physical connection had already been established. There could be no need for directing a contribution of operating expenses since the rail carrier was ordered to furnish the entire car service. It was free to establish such rates as it deemed reasonable, subject to review by the Commission if necessary. The only parties concerned in the order actually made were those before the Commission: appellee, which was required to furnish the service, and the state of New York, whose terminal facilities were thus to be used.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. New York Central Railroad Company…

The state of New York, by its superintendent of public works in a complaint filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, sought to compel the New York Central Railroad Company to provide transportation service between the public terminal of the Erie Barge Canal at Buffalo and shippers located along its tracks and along the lines of other railroads with which it can interchange traffic.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature