Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Calhoon v. Harvey — Opinion of the Court

The result of their allegations here, however, is an attempt to sweep into the ambit of their right to sue in federal court if they are denied an equal opportunity to nominate candidates under § 101 (a) (1) , a right to sue if they are not allowed to nominate anyone they choose regardless of his eligibility and qualifications under union restrictions. But Title IV, not Title I, sets standards for eligibility and qualifications of candidates and officials and provides its own separate and different administrative and judicial procedure for challenging those standards.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Calhoon v. Harvey — Opinion of the Court

Under § 402 (c) , the court is confined to setting the election aside only if 'the violation of section 401 may have affected the outcome.' For the aggrieved union member, this protection may be totally inadequate. The function of nominating a candidate is not always to gain the office. A faction may be vitally interested in appearing on the ballot merely to show that it is part of the political structure of the union. Under the Court's view, until such a faction approaches majority status, judicial relief in the federal courts will be absent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature