Summary

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Perkins v. Fourniquet (55 U.S. 313…

Now it is familiar to the jurisprudence of Louisiana, as shown in the decisions herein quoted, that the formal and official administration of the wife's estate extends only to her separate estate, and not to her community. Perkins, in this case, as surviving partner, would, and did, have the settlement of community, and not as curator of the Bynum estate, or as administrator of executor of his wife's estate. His right, power, and duty to settle the community, resulted wholly and exclusively from his being the surviving partner in community.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Perkins v. Fourniquet (55 U.S. 313…

The complainants do not give any proof against it. Nothing is in proof from which it can be inferred that they were given in ignorance of their rights in the estates of Benjamin S. Bynum and Mary Bynum when the releases were made, or that they were in any way circumvented by the respondent. Their testimony in the case is exclusively upon the community of gains, and upon the inability of the respondent to make such purchases and improvements from his own means.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Perkins v. Fourniquet (55 U.S. 313…

Fifth ground of defence is, that he has obtained the releases of complainants for all claims on account of the estate of their father and mother, and relies upon them as if formally plead in bar, denying they were obtained by fraud or concealment.
Sixth ground of defence submits that if said investments were made with money in which his wife had an interest, yet that defendant is entitled to the property, as tenant by curtesy during his natural life
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature