Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Roth v. United States — Concurrence-dissent Opinion (1957)

When the Federal Government puts liberty of press in one scale, it has a very limited duty to personal reputation or local tranquillity to weigh against it in the other. But state action affecting speech or press can and should be weighed against and reconciled with these conflicting social interests. Not only is the federal interest in protecting the Nation against pornography attenuated, but the dangers of federal censorship in this field are far greater than anything the States may do.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Roth v. United States — Concurrence-dissent Opinion (1957)

The petitioner was convicted under a statute which, under the judge's charge, [8] makes it criminal to sell books which "tend to stir sexual impulses and lead to sexually impure thoughts." I cannot agree that any book which tends to stir sexual impulses and lead to sexually impure thoughts necessarily is "utterly without redeeming social importance." Not only did this charge fail to measure up to the standards which I understand the Court to approve, but, as far as I can see, much of the great literature of the world could lead to conviction under such a view of the statute.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Roth v. United States — Concurrence-dissent Opinion (1957)

It is no answer to say, as the Court does, that obscenity is not protected speech. The point is that this statute, as here construed, defines obscenity so widely that it encompasses matters which might very well be protected speech. I do not think that the federal statute can be constitutionally construed to reach other than what the Government has termed as "hard-core" pornography. Nor do I think the statute can fairly be read as directed [p508] only at persons who are engaged in the business of catering to the prurient minded, even though their wares fall short of hard-core pornography.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature