Summary

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury United States v. Buchanan (49 U.S. 83…

On what ground, then, could the district judge properly leave its allowance to the jury, as he did at the trial in this case? It seems to us, that he should have instructed them that, in point of law, neither any act of Congress, nor any regulation of the department, justified the allowance; that the service performed was an ordinary one, connected with a purser's official duties, and consequently, for which, in point of law, he was entitled to no extra compensation by way of commissions or otherwise.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Levi Woodbury Levi Woodbury United States v. Buchanan (49 U.S. 83…

That at the time when the alleged claim of the government against the defendant, and the alleged credits of the defendant, arose, there was no law of the United States expressly defining the duties or the emoluments of a purser in the navy of the United States; but that the said duties and emoluments were regulated by the rules and regulations of the navy, by orders from the Navy Department, and by usage or custom.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature