Léonce-Pierre Manouvrier

Summary

Léonce-Pierre Manouvrier The American Journal of Science (1897)

It is quite natural to propose the question whether the precursor were not something more, that is to say an immediate ancestor of man or of a part of the human species.
The hypothesis of a simple precursor can be accepted without repugnance independent of the doctrine of evolution. It simply places an intermediate species between anthropoid and man and confirms once more the adage: Natura non faeit saltus.
Source: Wikisource

Léonce-Pierre Manouvrier The American Journal of Science (1897)

It has often been said that science does not consist in a heap, but in a chain, of facts. To discover this chain, hypothesis plays a necessary role. Certain zoologists suppose that the human species has had no ancestors. If this hypothesis, of which the probability is not of the first order, seems to them to be scientific and fruitful, the opposite hypothesis can boast of titles to belief at least equal, in our opinion.
Source: Wikisource

Léonce-Pierre Manouvrier The American Journal of Science (1897)

On this last point, the justice of the conclusion depends on the signification attached to the term human being. If the femur of Trinil, considered separately, proves that its possessor was not a monkey, it certainly does not prove that its possessor ought to be classed according to the totality of its conformation in the human species, or genus, so far as known. I have already insisted at length upon this fact, that the femur can be morphologically very human in a being low enough with respect to cranial development to merit only conventionally the name of man.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature