Summary

Nathan Clifford Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 288…

Intentional infringement is alleged by the complainants, and the burden is upon them to prove the allegation, as the charge imputes a wrongful act to the respondents.
Where the invention is embodied in a machine, the question of infringment is best determined by a comparison of the machine or apparatus constructed or used by the respondent with the mechanism described in the specification of complainant's patent.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 288…

Such an invention, if it produces a new and useful result, is the proper subject of a patent, and such a patent is valid and operative; but the right of the patentee under it differs in one respect from those of a patentee for an invention which consists of an entire machine, or of a new and useful device, as the rights of a patentee for a mere combination of old ingredients are not infringed, unless it appears that the alleged infringer made, used, or sold the entire combination.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature