Summary

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v…

The tenth charge, if it adds anything to those which have gone before, simply challenges the right of the petitioner and its members to express their views, by words and lawful conduct, on a subject of vital constitutional concern. Such a challenge cannot stand.
There is no occasion in this case for us to consider how much survives of the principle that a State can impose such conditions as it chooses on the right of a foreign corporation to do business within the State, or can exclude it from the State altogether.
Source: Wikisource

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v…

Proceeding to apply that rule to the Association's brief, the Supreme Court held that at least one of the assignments of error contained in each of the five numbered subdivisions of the 'Argument' section of the brief was without merit, and that it would therefore not consider the merit of any of the other assignments. [7] The Attorney General of Alabama argues that this is a non-federal ground of decision adequate to bar review in this Court of the serious constitutional claims which the Association presents. We find this position wholly unacceptable.
Source: Wikisource

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v…

The doing of a single act of business, if it be in the exercise of a corporate function, is prohibited. The policy of the Sonstitution and statute is to protect our citizens against the fraud and imposition of insolvent and unreliable corporations, and to place them in an attitude to be reached by legal process from our courts in favor of citizens having cause of complaint.' Alabama Western R. Co.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature