Summary

Peter Vivian Daniel Ladd v. Ladd — Opinion of the Court

May not the term interest, contained in that enumeration, considered in its relative collocation to the terms rents and profits, be understood as equivalent with the word estate, especially when the terms rents and profits may be correctly taken to cover interest understood as mere revenue, and still more especially when we keep in view the previous purpose set forth in the deed,-that of settling on the feme, and subjecting to her disposition by deed or will, the whole of her estate, real and personal?
Source: Wikisource

Peter Vivian Daniel Ladd v. Ladd — Opinion of the Court

We do not see the force of this objection, inasmuch as, by the express terms of the deed, authority was given the trustee or the bank to sell the property in separate parcels, as either might deem it necessary or advisable; and it would have been impracticable before an experiment to ascertain a priori how much of the property would be requisite for the satisfaction of the debt, and thus a literal adherence to the proviso would lead either to the preventing a sale altogether, or to the sacrifice of the whole estate, whether there should have been a necessity for it or not.
Source: Wikisource

Peter Vivian Daniel Ladd v. Ladd — Opinion of the Court

But supposing the execution of the power of appointment defective in strictly legal requisites, a court of equity would leave her to her strictly legal remedy, and not help her to an unconscionable advantage; but, on the contrary, would actively in terpose to relieve the purchaser or mortgagee, and compel the feme covert or infant to do equity.
Under the circumstances of this case, it would be against conscience, and fraudulent, for the complainant to take advantage of the alleged defects in the deed.
And married women, as well as infants, are barred by their own frauds.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature