Portal:Civil Aeronautics Board

Summary

Portal:Civil Aeronautics Board Aviation Accident Report: Eastern Air Lines Flight 14 (1942)

The testimony of Captain O'Brien and First Officer Crabtree displays substantial differences of opinion as to the degree of turbulence encountered, the instrument readings and the maneuvers of the airplane while they were in the turbulent air. Captain O'Brien's description of the flight with the attendant turbulence leads to the conclusion that the turbulence was of such intensity that it became impossible to have complete control of the maneuvers of the airplane.
Source: Wikisource

Portal:Civil Aeronautics Board Aviation Accident Report: Eastern Air Lines Flight 14 (1942)

The purpose of these previsions is completely defeated if an airline fails to provide adequate dispatchers thus requiring them to communicate over such long distances that they cannot secure current information and by requiring them to have so many flights under their control that they cannot pay adequate attention to any of them. If a trained dispatcher had been located in the Florida sector of Route 6, he would have recognized the significance of Captain Meyers' 8:32 A.M. radio message that he was on instruments and encountering heavy turbulence.
Source: Wikisource

Portal:Civil Aeronautics Board Aviation Accident Report: Eastern Air Lines Flight 14 (1942)

Therefore it is clearly the responsibility of the company dispatcher and meteorologist to keep in constant touch with developments in the weather and to advise pilots if forecasts upon which they are depending appear to be erroneous. The 7:35 A.M. sequence report should have created a reasonable doubt in the mind of Eastern's Miami meteorologist as to the adequacy of both the trip and Weather Bureau forecasts, but after receiving, and presumably studying that report he made no attempt to supplement his original forecast or to issue a special revised forecast.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature