Robert Stawell Ball

Robert Stawell Ball

Summary

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1883)

To these two-dimensioned geometers geodesies would possess many of the attributes of straight lines in ordinary space. If the surface to which the beings were confined were actually a plane, then the geometry would be the same as our geometry. They would find that only one straight line could be drawn between two points, that through a point only one parallel to a given line could be drawn, and that the ends of a line would never meet even though the line be prolonged to infinity.
We might also suppose that intelligent beings could exist on the surface of a sphere.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1883)

The point which we have now gained is one of very great importance. In our ordinary conceptions of space the geodesic surfaces are of course our ordinary planes, and the common curvature they possess is zero, but the condition that rigid bodies shall be capable of translation with unaltered features does not require that the curvatures shall be zero, it merely requires that the curvatures shall be constant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Stawell Ball Robert Stawell Ball Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1883)

In one sense, however, the dwellers on the sphere and on the plane have an axiom in common. In each case it will be possible for a figure to be moved about without alteration of its dimensions. A spherical triangle can be moved on the surface of a sphere without distortion just as a plane triangle may be moved in a plane. The sphere-dwellers and the plane-dwellers would be equally able to apply the test of congruence. It is, however, possible to suppose reasoning beings confined to a space in which the translation of a rigid figure is impossible.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature