Summary

Rufus Wheeler Peckham Clews v. Jamieson — Opinion of the Court

In cases where the equity doctrine of trusts has been extended so as to embrace other relations of a fiduciary kind, while it may not be said that a court of equity possesses exclusive jurisdiction, yet it is well settled that in such case there is so much of the trust character between the parties so situated that the jurisdiction of equity, though not exclusive, is acknowledged.
Source: Wikisource

Rufus Wheeler Peckham Clews v. Jamieson — Opinion of the Court

Contracts for the future delivery of merchandise or stock are not void, whether such property is in existence in the hands of the seller or to be subsequently acquired. On their face these transactions are legal, and the law does not, in the absence of proof, presume that the parties are gambling. The proof must show that there was a mutual understanding that the transaction was to be a mere settlement of differences; in other words, a mere wagering contract.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature