Summary

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v…

The State's interest in enforcing its prohibition, in order to be sufficiently compelling to outweigh a free exercise claim, cannot be merely abstract or symbolic. The State cannot plausibly assert that unbending application of a criminal prohibition is essential to fulfill any compelling interest, if it does not, in fact, attempt to enforce that prohibition. In this case, the State actually has not evinced any concrete interest in enforcing its drug laws against religious users of peyote.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature