Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Abington School District v. Schempp… (1963)

We have come to recognize through bitter experience that it is not within the power of government to invade that citadel, whether its purpose or effect be to aid or oppose, to advance or retard. In the relationship between man and religion, the State is firmly committed to a position of neutrality. Though the application of that rule requires interpretation of a delicate sort, the rule itself is clearly and concisely stated in the words of the First Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Abington School District v. Schempp… (1963)

We repeat and again reaffirm that neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person 'to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.' Neither can constitutionally pass laws or impose requirements which aid all religions as against non-believers, and neither can aid those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Abington School District v. Schempp… (1963)

This is not to say, however, that religion has been so identified with our history and government that religious freedom is not likewise as strongly imbedded in our public and private life. Nothing but the most telling of personal experiences in religious persecution suffered by our forebears, see Everson v. Board of Education, supra, at 8-11, could have planted our belief in liberty of religious opinion any more deeply in our heritage.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature