Summary

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York…

The grant of a tax exemption is not sponsorship since the government does not transfer part of its revenue to churches but simply abstains from demanding that the church support the state. No one has ever suggested that tax exemption has converted libraries, art galleries, or hospitals into arms of the state or put employees 'on the public payroll.' There is no genuine nexus between tax exemption and establishment of religion.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York…

In Everson the Court declined to construe the Religion Clauses with a literalness that would undermine the ultimate constitutional objective as illuminated by history. Surely, bus transportation and police protection to pupils who receive religious instruction 'aid' that particular religion to maintain schools that plainly tend to assure future adherents to a particular faith by having control of their total education at an early age.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York…

We cannot read New York's statute as attempting to establish religion; it is simply sparing the exercise of religion from the burden of property taxation levied on private profit institutions.
We find it unnecessary to justify the tax exemption on the social welfare services or 'good works' that some churches perform for parishioners and others-family counselling, aid to the elderly and the infirm, and to children. Churches vary substantially in the scope of such services; programs expand or contract according to resources and need.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature