Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church in North America…

The opinion radiates, however, a spirit of freedom for religious organizations, an independence from secular control or manipulation, in short, power to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well as those of faith and doctrine. Freedom to select the clergy, where no improper methods of choice are proven, [23] we think, must now be said to have federal constitutional protection as a part of the free exercise of religion against state interference.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church in North America…

It is an exaggeration to say that those sound statements point to a legislative power to take away from a church's governing body and its duly ordained representative the possession and use of a building held in trust for the purposes for which it is being employed because of an apprehension, even though reasonable, that it may be employed for improper purposes.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church in North America…

Ours is a government which by the 'law of its being' allows no statute, state or national, that prohibits the free exercise of religion. There are occasions when civil courts must draw lines between the responsibilities of church and state for the disposition or use of property. [25] Even in those cases when the property right follows as an incident from decisions of the church custom or law on ecclesiastical issues, the church rule controls.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature