Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Sra v. Minnesota — Opinion of the Court

Since the opinion of the Court expresses no disapproval of these authorities, I take it that everything said on the question of Minnesota's territorial jurisdiction to tax is dictum. Our opinion should be confined to the single question which the petitioner presents for our decision, whether the retention by the United States of the legal title to the taxed land precludes its taxation to petitioner, which, under its contract with the Government, has acquired possession and right to possession.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Sra v. Minnesota — Opinion of the Court

We do not, however, conclude that their rationale leads to an exemption from state taxation of all lands in which the United States holds legal title as security for the purchase price. To say that the payment of the purchase price is a necessary condition precedent to the loss of federal immunity is to make the rule too mechanical. It should be sufficiently flexible to subject real private rights disentangled from federal policies, to state taxation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature