Thomas Fowler and John Malcolm Mitchell

Summary

Thomas Fowler and John Malcolm Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 24… (1911)

As a social being, man is part of a greater harmony, and, in order that he may contribute to the happiness of the whole, he must order his extra-regarding activities so that they shall not clash with his environs. Only when he has regulated his internal and his social relations by this ideal can he be regarded as truly moral. The egoist and the altruist are both imperfect. In the ripe perfection of humanity, the two impulses will be perfectly adjusted. Thus, by the criterion of harmony, Shaftesbury refutes Hobbes, and deduces the virtue of benevolence as indispensable to morality.
Source: Wikisource

Thomas Fowler and John Malcolm Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 24… (1911)

From these results we see that Shaftesbury, opposed to Hobbes and Locke, is in close agreement with Hutcheson (q.v.) , and that he is ultimately a deeply religious thinker, inasmuch as he discards the moral sanction of public opinion, the terrors of future punishment, the authority of the civil authority, as the main incentives to goodness, and substitutes the voice of conscience and the love of God. These two alone move men to aim at perfect harmony for its own sake in the man and in the universe.
Shaftesbury’s philosophical activity was confined to ethics, aesthetics and religion.
Source: Wikisource

Thomas Fowler and John Malcolm Mitchell 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 24… (1911)

In the popular mind, Shaftesbury is generally regarded as a writer hostile to religion. But, however short his orthodoxy might fall if tried by the standards of any particular church, his temperament was pre-eminently religious. This fact is shown in his letters. The belief in a God, all-wise, all-just and all-merciful, governing the world providentially for the best, pervades all his works, his correspondence and his life. Nor had he any wish to undermine established beliefs, except where he conceived that they conflicted with a truer religion and a purer morality.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature