Summary

Thurgood Marshall Eastern Airlines Inc. v. Floyd…

However, this general proposition of French tort law does not demonstrate that the specific phrase chosen by the contracting parties-"lesion corporelle"-covers purely psychic injury.
We find it noteworthy, moreover, that scholars who read "lesion corporelle" as encompassing psychic injury do not base their argument on explanations of this term in French cases or French treatises or even in the French Civil Code; rather, they chiefly rely on the principle of French tort law that any damage can "giv [e] rise to reparation when it is real and has been verified."
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Eastern Airlines Inc. v. Floyd…

Citing Saks, the Court of Appeals treated the Hague Protocol's use of "personal injury" as a " 'subsequent interpretation of the signatories' " that "helps clarify the meaning" of "lesion corporelle." See 872 F.2d, at 1474-1475. However, we do not accept the argument that the Hague Protocol signatories intended "personal injury" to be an interpretive translation of "lesion corporelle" where there is no evidence that they intended the authentic English text to effect a substantive change in, or clarification of that term.
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Eastern Airlines Inc. v. Floyd…

Turning next to cases, we likewise discover no French court decisions in or before 1929 that explain the phrase "lesion corporelle," nor do the parties direct us to any. Indeed, we find no French case construing Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention to cover psychic injury. The only reports of French cases we did find that used the term "lesion corporelle" are relatively recent and involve physical injuries caused by automobile accidents and other incidents. [6] These cases tend to support the conclusion that, in French legal usage, the term "lesion corporelle" refers only to physical injuries.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature