Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado…

Despite the rationality of according at least one representative to each county, it is clear that such a system of representation, coupled with a provision fixing the maximum number of members in the legislative body-a necessity if the body is to remain small enough for manageably effective action-has the result of creating some population disparities among districts. But since the disparity flows from the effectuation of a rational state policy, the mere existence of the disparity itself can hardly be considered an invidious discrimination.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado…

I do know enough to realize that Montana with its vast distances is not Rhode Island with its heavy concentrations of people. I do know enough to be aware of the great variations among the several States in their historic manner of distributing legislative power-of the Governors' Councils in New England, of the broad powers of initiative and referendum retained in some States by the people, of the legislative power which some States give to their Governors, by the right of veto or otherwise of the widely autonomous home rule which many States give to their cities.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado…

In the allocation of representation in their State Legislatures, Colorado and New York have adopted completely rational plans which reflect an informed response to their particularized characteristics and needs. The plans are quite different, just as Colorado and New York are quite different. But each State, while clearly ensuring that in its legislative councils the will of the majority of the electorate shall rule, has sought to provide that no identifiable minority shall be completely silenced or engulfed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature