Weston Styleman Walford

Summary

Weston Styleman Walford Archaeological Journal (1846)

Diminutive effigies, like that at Horsted Keynes, in which the proportions are those of a man, are sometimes supposed to represent children, but I think without good reason.
An effigy is, primâ facie, to be considered as representing that, to which, having regard to the costume and general appearance, it bears most resemblance, irrespectively of its size; for it is unreasonable from size alone to infer that it was not intended for a full-grown person.
Thus, a small effigy, apparently of a knight or priest, is to be taken as representing an adult
Source: Wikisource

Weston Styleman Walford Archaeological Journal (1845)

After all, whether there be or be not effigies of Templars existing, is a fit subject for archæological enquiry. Should there eventually be discovered any effigy referrible to their era, representing a man, whether in armour or not, habited in a mantle with a cross on his breast or shoulder, and with a long beard, or having either of these peculiarities, such an effigy may probably be that of a Templar or a Hospitaller.
Source: Wikisource

Weston Styleman Walford Archaeological Journal (1846)

But as these effigies occur where economy is not likely to have been much considered, another motive must be sought. It seems not unreasonable to surmise that they were placed, with something of conventional propriety, where a portion only of the remains was deposited, and as the full-sized coffin or grave in other cases determined the magnitude of the effigy, so the small receptacle for the heart, or some portion of the remains, led to a proportionate commemorative effigy. I have stated that the hands of the Horsted knight were brought together on the breast.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature