Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. Power Reactor Development Company v…

There is also agreement that the regulation's first required safety finding, 'that (the AEC) has information sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that a facility of the general type proposed can be constructed and operated at the proposed location without undue risk to the health and safety of the public,' is a valid exercise of the rule-making power conferred upon the AEC by statute, and requires that some finding as to safety of operation be made even before a provisional construction permit is granted.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Power Reactor Development Company v…

Petitioners agree that some finding directed to safety of operation must be made at the construction-permit stage of the proceeding, but argue that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Commission must have the same degree of certitude at this preliminary point as when it licenses operation. In order to understand how the controversy arises and what is involved in its resolution, it will be necessary to state the proceedings in the case at some length, and then describe in detail the government statute and administrative regulations.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Power Reactor Development Company v…

The Commission emphasized that 'public safety is the first, last, and a permanent consideration in any decision on the issuance of a construction permit or a license to operate a nuclear facility.' Even after operation of the reactor is licensed-if it ever is-the Commission, it said, will retain jurisdiction over PRDC's activities to ensure that the highest safety standards are maintained.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature