Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United Steelworkers of America v…

But it is the court, not the President, that is entrusted by Article III of the Constitution to shape and fashion the decree. If a federal court is to do it, it must act in its traditional manner, not as a military commander ordering people to work willy-nilly, nor as the President's Administrative Assistant. If the federal court is to be merely an automaton stamping the papers an Attorney General presents, the judicial function rises to no higher level than an IBM machine. Those who grew up with equity and know its great history should never tolerate that mechanical conception.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United Steelworkers of America v…

The injunction applies all the force of the Federal Government against men whose work has nothing to do with military defense as well as against those whose inactivity imperils the 'national safety.' It is not confined to the precise evil at which the present Act is aimed. Like the old labor injunctions that brought discredit to the federal judiciary this is a blanket injunction broad and all-inclusive, bringing within its scope men whose work has nothing whatsoever to do with the defense needs of the Nation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United Steelworkers of America v…

I cannot believe that Congress intended the federal courts to issue injunctions that bludgeon all workers merely because the labor of a few of them is needed in the interest of 'national safety.'
Labor goes back to work under the present injunction on terms dictated by the industry, not on terms that have been found to be fair to labor and to industry. The steel industry exploits a tremendous advantage:
'Our steel mills can produce in nine months all the metal the country can use in a year.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature