Summary

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist Bragdon v. Abbott — Concurrence-dissent Rehnquist (1998)

Calling reproduction a major life activity is somewhat inartful. Reproduction is not an activity at all, but a process. One could be described as breathing, walking, or performing manual tasks, but a human being (as opposed to a copier machine or a gremlin) would never be described as reproducing. I assume that in using the term reproduction, respondent and the Court are referring to the numerous discrete activities that comprise the reproductive process, and that is the sense in which I have used the term.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist Bragdon v. Abbott — Concurrence-dissent Rehnquist (1998)

There are numerous disorders of the reproductive system, such as dysmenorrhea and endometriosis, which are so painful that they limit a woman's ability to engage in major life activities such as walking and working. And, obviously, cancer of the various reproductive organs limits one's ability to engage in numerous activities other than reproduction.
But even if I were to assume that reproduction is a major life activity of respondent, I do not agree that an asymptomatic HIV infection "substantially limits" that activity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature